Study Plan · Product Guide
No AI guesses the ranking. It is one transparent rule you can explain to any learner. This page is the rule, in plain English.
A learner subscribes and we say: "We tell you exactly what to study next, ranked by what the exam actually asks, weighted by where you are weak." That promise is only honest if the order comes from real data. So the order is computed, the same way, every time. Here is how.
For every chapter, we ask two questions and multiply the answers:
Rank every chapter by that number, highest first. The top eligible chapter becomes "study this today." That is the engine. Everything below is just making those two numbers honest.
We counted every question from past exams (6,493 for JEE) and tagged each to a chapter. A chapter the exam asks constantly scores near 1.0. A chapter it barely touches scores near 0. Recent years count more than old ones. This number is the same for every learner.
From your practice and mock history. If you reliably get a chapter right, your gap is small. If you struggle or have never touched it, your gap is large (up to 1.0). This is the only part that is personal to you, and it works the same in any subject.
Multiplying means a chapter only ranks high when both things are true: the exam cares AND you are weak. This is the part that makes the plan smart instead of obvious.
Say a learner answers 4 questions on Thermodynamics and gets all 4 right. Are they a master? No — 4 questions is luck, not proof. If we believed it, the plan would tell them to skip a chapter they might actually be shaky on.
So before trusting a score, we pull it toward the average until there is enough evidence. Four perfect answers might show as "68% confident" instead of "90%." After 30 or 40 questions, we trust the real number and stop pulling. One word for it: we discount scores we haven't earned yet. New learner with zero attempts? We show a dash, never an invented percentage.
Same exam date, five chapters. Watch how the order falls out — it is not the order you would guess.
| Chapter | Subject | Exam cares | Her gap | Priority | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rotational Motion | Physics | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.70 | Tested + never practiced → #1 |
| Electrostatics | Physics | 0.90 | 0.58 | 0.52 | Heavily tested, still shaky |
| Thermodynamics | Chemistry | 0.85 | 0.32 | 0.27 | 4 lucky answers, discounted |
| Calculus | Maths | 0.95 | 0.23 | 0.22 | Most-tested of all — but she owns it |
| Units & Dimensions | Physics | 0.15 | 0.63 | 0.10 | She's weak, but exam ignores it |
Calculus is the single most-tested chapter (0.95) yet ranks 4th — Priya already knows it. Units is her 2nd-biggest weakness yet ranks last — the exam barely asks it. The plan spends her time where tested-and-weak overlap. That is the whole product in one table.
Rotational Motion ranked #1, but suppose it needs "Newton's Laws" first and Priya hasn't done those. The plan still lists Rotational Motion as her top goal, but "study today" skips down to the next chapter she's actually ready for (Electrostatics). It never tells her to start something she can't follow yet. The ranking says what matters; the prerequisites decide what she's allowed to start now.
A single percent: how exam-ready am I right now, weighted so that being strong in heavily-tested chapters counts more than being strong in trivia. Priya sits around 61%. It climbs as she closes high-importance gaps — which is exactly what the plan keeps pointing her at.
Same engine, three experiences depending on who shows up.
Not subscribed. Sees a free outline teaser and an upgrade nudge. No real ranking until they go Pro. This is the conversion hook.
"Cold start." We have no practice data, so accuracy shows as a dash. Order is driven by exam-importance alone, and "today" is the top chapter they're ready for. Phase: diagnose.
Has practiced. Full personalized ranking, real accuracy, readiness percent climbing. Every practice session feeds back and re-ranks. Phase: master / simulate.
And the loop that connects them: a "no history" learner who practices one chapter becomes an "active" learner the very next load. The plan is never stale.
One rule: study what's both heavily-tested and where you're weak. One personal number: your gap. One honesty rule: never invent a score we haven't earned — show a dash, or degrade to an empty state, rather than fake a plan. No AI in the loop deciding your rank, which is why every position is explainable to the learner who asks "why this chapter?"